Literature Review How to write

publications check into How to write BY Ravit*G1 name 1 Writing a publications Review What is a lit Review? A books look back is a survey and demonstrateion of the literary works in a given argona of believe. It is a concise overview of what has been studied, argued, and established closely a contain, and it is unremarkably liftd chronologically or thematically. A literature examine is write in essay format. It is not an annotated bibliography, beca use it groups cerebrate change by reversals together and discusses trends and disciplines rather than centering on one item at a m.It is not a compendium rather, it evaluates former and urrent look in demand to how relevant and/or useful it is and how it relates to your cause indecision. A Literature Review is to a greater extent than an Annotated Bibliography or a summary, because you atomic number 18 organizing and presenting your sources in wrong of their overall relationship to your induce project. Pu rpose A literature examine is written to high exercise set out specific arguments and ideas in a range of study. By play up these arguments, the writer attempts to show what has been studied in the matter, and also where the weaknesses, gaps, or adjourns aiming further study are.The analyse should in that respectfore also tell to the endorser why the riters look for is useful, necessary, consequential, and valid. Questions a Literature Review Should Answer request questions such as the following allow for help you sift done your sources and organize your literature check. Remember, the literature reassessment organizes the introductory question in the light of what you are planning to do in your give birth project. Whats been done in this emergence land to date? What are the significant discoveries, signalize concepts, arguments, and/or theories that scholars have put onward? Which are the important works?On which cross areas of the subject has previous research oncentrated? Have there been developments over term? What ruleologies have been used? be there any gaps in the research? Are there areas that havent been looked at closely yet, just which should be? Are there unsanded ship canal of looking at the topic? Are there improved methodologies for researching this take? What future directions should research in this thing take? How provide your research get on on or depart from afoot(predicate) and previous research on the topic? What part will your research go for to the field?Length The length ofa literature follow varies depending on its purpose and audience. In a hesis or dissertation, the round is usually a full chapter (at to the lowest degree 20 pages), but for an assignment it may single be a few pages. mental synthesis There are several bureaus to organize and structure a literature review. Two common ways are chronologically and thematically. Chronological In a chronological review, you will group and di scuss your sources in order of their appearance (usually publication), highlight the changes in research in the field and your specific topic over time.This method is useful for papers focusing on research methodology, historiographical papers, and other(a) composing where time becomes an important lement. For example, a literature review on theories of mental disorder talent present how the intellectual of mental illness has changed through the centuries, by giving a series of examples of key developments and ending with original theories and the direction your research will take. thematic In a thematic review, you will group and discuss your sources in terms of the themes or topics they cover.This method is often a stronger one organizationally, and it can help you protest the urge to summarize your sources. By classify themes or topics of research together, you will e able to demonstrate the roles of topics that are important to your research. For example, if the topic of the literature review is changes in popular music, then there qualification be separate sections on research involving the production of music, research on the dispersal of music, research on the commentary of music, and diachronic studies of popular music.No matter which method you choose, recollect Within separately(prenominal) section of a literature review, it is important to discuss how the research relates to other studies (how is it similar or different, what other studies have been done, etc. as rise up as to demonstrate how it relates to your own work. This is what the review is for dont leave this connection out line http//www. smu. ca/ administration/library/litrev. hypertext markup language Article 2 Write a Literature Review 1.Introduction Not to be confused with a book review, a literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources (e. g. dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or possibilit y, providing a description, summary, and small evaluation of each work. The purpose is to purpose an overview of significant literature published on a topic. 2. Components Similar to original research, development of the literature review requires four stages chore formulationwhich topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues?Literature searchfinding existents relevant to the offspring being explored Data evaluation ascertain which literature makes a significant contribution to the belowstanding of the topic Analysis and interpretation discussing the findings and conclusions of liable(p) literature Literature reviews should stop the following elements An overview of the subject, issue or theory under circumstance, along with the bjectives of the literature review Division of works under review into categories (e. g. hose in support of a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative theses entirely) chronicle of how each work is si milar to and how it varies from the others Conclusions as to which papers are best considered in their argument, are most persuade of their opinions, and make the superlative contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research In assessing each piece, consideration should be given to ProvenanceWhat are the authors credentials? Are the authors arguments supported by evidence (e. . primary historical material, face studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings)? Objectivityls the authors status even- handed or prejudicial? Is un manage data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the authors principal? PersuasivenessWhich of the authors theses are most/least convincing? ValueAre the authors arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject? 3. Definition and Use/PurposeA literature review may constitute an necessary chapter of a thesis or dissertation, or may be a self-contained review of writings on a subject. In either case, its purpose is to amaze each work in the place setting of its contribution to the understanding of the subject under review Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration detect new ways to interpret, and shed light on any gaps in, previous research Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies Identify areas of prior scholarship to disallow duplication of effort Point the way forward for further researchPlace ones original work (in the case ot theses or dissertations) in the context ot existing literature The literature review itself, however, does not present new primary scholarship. http//library. ucsc. edu/help/howto/write-a-literature-review What is a review of the literature? A literature review is an government note of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. Occasionally you will be asked to writ e one as a separate assignment (sometimes in the form of an annotated bibliographysee the bottom of the neighboring page), but more often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research eport, or thesis.In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guide concept (e. g. , your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your quarrelsome thesis). It is not Just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries Besides enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and demonstrate skills in deuce areas 1 . formation want the big businessman to scan the literature efficiently, using manual or computerized methods, to pick up a set of useful articles and books 2. critical appraisal the top executive to app ly principles of analysis to identify naive and valid studies. A literature review must do these things 1 . be organized around and related straight to the thesis or research question you are developing 2. synthesize results into a summary of what is and is not known 3. identify areas of controversy in the literature 4. ormulate questions that need further research Ask yourself questions like these . What is the specific thesis, problem, or research question that my literature review helps to define? 2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory? methodology? policy? numerical research (e. g. on the effectiveness of a new procedure)? qualitative research (e. g. , studies )? 3. What is the screen background of my literature revie w? What types ot publications am I using (e. g. , Journals, books government documents, popular media)?What discipline am I working in (e. g. , nursing psychology, sociology, medicine)? 4. How good was my information seeking? Has my search been wide enough to chequer Ive found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude immaterial material? Is the number of sources Ive used beguile for the length of my paper? 5. Have I critically analysed the literature I use? Do I follow through a set of concepts and questions, comparing items to each other in the ways they get away with them?